Message Board
Sign up  |   |   |  Calendar
 
 
 


Reply
  Author   Comment   Page 9 of 11     «   Prev   6   7   8   9   10   11   Next
dennislkaufman

Avatar / Picture

Moderator
Registered:
Posts: 558
Reply with quote  #121 
This phone book that Nanette uses to connect Jack to the Oakland County child murders that she found when she was going through my stuff, did not belong to Jack. When Nanette found this phone book she went into one of her frenzies about this being evidence connecting Jack to even more murders. I would find out later that this phone book came from a storage locker we had bought at an auction. After I realized that this was not Jack's, I asked her what made her so sure this phone book belonged to Jack? She told me she had identified some of the writing in it, and it was Jack's. After she told me this I was finally able to locate the people who originally owned the storage unit we had purchased, and they confirmed that this phone book belonged to them, this confirmed to me that Nanette was a fraud.

I want to make it clear that Nanette's ridiculous accusations trying to connect Jack to every murder across the country are just that "ridiculous"!
jbradfield66

Registered:
Posts: 112
Reply with quote  #122 
Well, that's pretty concrete evidence that discredits nanette and her sycophants who have linked jack to every high-profile murder in modern history. Not unlike the time she identified the hoax cheese letter as jack's writing, as well as the cut and past Dahlia letters. How someone could link newspaper cut outs was beyond me. No doubt now she's a fraud at worst and epically incompetent at best.

Sorry terryb, you hitched your wagon to the wrong star.
TerryB

Registered:
Posts: 925
Reply with quote  #123 
I still haven't seen any evidence that Nanette did anything wrong.

You have yet to produce any "evidence" that Nanette forged anything in the Tim Miller case or anything else for that matter.

Just like jbradfield66 never deals in "evidence" he's just really worried that his client might get popped by the facts and evidence being put together.


__________________
One small bit of info might make all the difference.
jbradfield66

Registered:
Posts: 112
Reply with quote  #124 
hahah, you are such a jackass. What client? Where's your evidence? Nope, just accusations. Hey Terryb, sincerely go fuck yourself moron. Again, more conspiracy bullshit from Terry. Let's think about this. Terryb is accusing me of having a 'client'? First of what the fuck is this douche even talking about? Secondly, if that was the case why in the hell would I be on a messageboard drawing attention to anything? You are such a moron terry. In case you missed it the first time, seriously go fuck yourself you creepy fucking pedophile.
TerryB

Registered:
Posts: 925
Reply with quote  #125 
Once again this jbradfield666 jerk clearly demonstrates what a low-life turd he really is.
__________________
One small bit of info might make all the difference.
jbradfield66

Registered:
Posts: 112
Reply with quote  #126 
So, no answer to the questions? Just the same old baseless accusations without any evidence? Hell, I'd even settle for a clear coherent accusation. Same bullshit from pedo terry. Terry, can you elaborate on your theory that jack dressed up like Santa Claus and flew a private plane to Boulder colorado so he could move about undetected? I'd like to hear more about this.
dennislkaufman

Avatar / Picture

Moderator
Registered:
Posts: 558
Reply with quote  #127 
TerryB stated,I still haven't seen any evidence that Nanette did anything wrong.

Well I know with absolute certainty that Jack never had possession of this phone book that Nanette claims ties him to the Oakland County murders. This phone book came from a storage that my girlfriend and I purchased at an auction in 2008. Jack died in 2006, there is no way possible for Jack to have written in this phone book, period! Nanette told me that some of the writing is this phone book was positively Jack's. Well she was wrong Jack never touched that phone book, and this I know. I don't need to prove it to TerryB, or anyone else. I already knew who Jack was before I contacted Nanette, and that will never change. Nanette's opinion is now worthless to me, and any claims made by her mean absolutely nothing. Even though her findings support my case, I refuse to support her ridiculous theories trying to link Jack to every unsolved murder across the country, this is BULLSHIT! She has over stepped her boundaries in every aspect of this case, and if you don't see this TerryB then something is definitely wrong.
jbradfield66

Registered:
Posts: 112
Reply with quote  #128 
Well, that is pretty solid evidence to confirm what many suspected all along.

Terry will likely try to rationalize this by blaming it on a conspiracy, or an impostor or suggest that someone has 'hacked' the board ro some other bit of silliness. The simplest andmost logical explanation is either nanette is grossly incompetent or a conniving fraud. Both scenarios are equally plausible.
dennislkaufman

Avatar / Picture

Moderator
Registered:
Posts: 558
Reply with quote  #129 
In reply to Bretts post #120

Bretts I am glad you were able to hear Jack's confession. I know Voigt, Yarbrough, and few others have mislead people into believing Jack never confessed, but he did and they know this. I agree this case should have stayed focused solely on Zodiac, but you can thank Nanatte (the nutcase) for doing such a wonderful job.
dennislkaufman

Avatar / Picture

Moderator
Registered:
Posts: 558
Reply with quote  #130 
This is Nanette's response to the phone book she used to connect Jack to the Oakland County murders.


First off, I have never done an exam on the phone book or the handwriting in it. I indicated that there was handwriting that was similar, but an exam wasn't in my near future until I finished school. Second, Dennis does tell people what he wants them to believe and follow, leaving just enough out, so that when you call him on it, he can say he never said it. This is the main reason why I dumped him.



Dennis gave me JT's belongings supposedly! That is where I found the phone book, and Dennis was standing right next to me in my garage when I found it. Dennis claimed it was not his, and I proceeded to read the names in it to him to see if he recognized anyone. The last name I read on the front inside cover was John Hatfield. When I mentioned this name, Dennis proceeded to act shocked and surprised that this was the name of a person that he believed JT had killed. At some point in 77 when JT moved the family back to Texas, Dennis said that this man came to live with them out of the blue. One night JT became furious with him because he had been telling Dennis and the other kids some of the things that he and JT had been doing. Dennis claimed that he and his siblings were watching tv in the living room when JT began smacking this man in the head with a table leg. JT told the children to go to the room, but they listened to him hitting this man over and over again. Dennis said he could never forget the sound of the table leg hitting his skull. The next morning when the woke up, they never seen John again, but there was blood all over the place, and JT paid each of them a couple dollars to clean it up.



There is Dennis saying what he wants someone to follow. His BS that it was from a storage shed after all the claims I list above is non-sense and supercilious. [sic]



That would be freaky though that this phone book is from the very same period as the OCC murders, and ends up in CA in the hands of no one other than DK. LMFAO


In the first sentence Nanette claims she never did an exam on the phone book, or the writing in it. She has already contacted the victims families and the law enforcement agency investigating the case, all this without even confirming the phone book belonged to Jack? Bullshit! There is no way to lie your way out of this one Sweetcheeks! Another thing, just because the name John Hatfield is in the phone book doesn't mean it's the same man that lived with us. The name "John Hatfield" is about as common as "Jim Smith" so that isn't gonna work either! You have been exposed Numbnuts! Do you know why every time you deal with law enforcement and use the FBI for a reference they never call you back? Because the FBI tells them how much of a nut job you are! I am sick and tired of dealing with this kind of bullshit from this lying, manipulating, attention seeking, moron! She fits in well with Voigt, Yarbrough, and the few other losers in their little group.
jbradfield66

Registered:
Posts: 112
Reply with quote  #131 
It's hilarious that nanette has quite literally never not matched a handwriting sample to JT. As soon as someone floats a theory she's there matching handwriting. For real, has there ever been an incident where she decided the handwriting didn't match?

Additionally hilarious is that in the unlikely event she is called as an expert witness again all the opposing lawyer has to do is google her credentials and bam, case dismissed your honour. It's too bad Dennis removed all her posts. Those beauties were career enders. Not that she's a stranger to that. She takes courses that will admit anyone because it makes her an 'expert' in her mind and that satiates her ego. How'd that real estate licence work out nanette? Then she's too incompetent to make it work. Next she'll be taking an air conditioner repair class at night school or perhaps she will draw the turtle on a matchbook and declare herself an artist. Until then it's just her and terryb making asses of themselves. The only true sad part of the whole scenario is that she has kids. I do feel bad for them. At least no one would sleep with catseye and terryb isn't interested in sex with adults.
dennislkaufman

Avatar / Picture

Moderator
Registered:
Posts: 558
Reply with quote  #132 
Hey Nanette why did you lie about Tim Miller and Steph Watts telling you I tried to sell them evidence? Then you told this lie to Kris Pickel and she called Tim herself to verify what you had told her, and he said it was bullshit! Then you tried to cover up your lies by claiming you were set up by these folks. Why would Tim Miller waste his time trying to set you up? You are the one that contacted him, remember?

You say that no one will deal with me, really I am contacted almost daily about doing interviews and guess what, I decline.

You matched Jack's writing to this phone book, and you were wrong. You thought that stupid ass cheese letter was real too, and you were wrong.

Remove all material from the Internet regarding this case Nanette, you have done enough damage with your stupidity...
dennislkaufman

Avatar / Picture

Moderator
Registered:
Posts: 558
Reply with quote  #133 
This is Nanette's response to my last post.

I did not render an opinion on the handwriting found in the phone book from MI. I have never completed an exam on any of the writing, and I have not ever said that it was JT's writing, I said there were similarities, and that I would not be doing any exams on it until completion of school. This is just more BS and lies from DK to try to make me look bad. DK is desperate, and if bashing me gets him some attention so be it! Just be warned, it only makes him look like a bigger liar with each false story that he tells, and that doesn't hold well for his case.

The day when Nanette showed me this phone book she was on one of her frenzies talking a hundred miles an hour about how Jack was responsible for the Oakland County Murders. I asked her, how do we know this phone book belongs to Jack? She told me that some of the writing in it was Jack's. My girlfriend Dina was there and heard the entire conversation.

Nanette let me get this strait, you are saying that you contacted law enforcement, and the victims family, and made such a big deal about how Jack was responsible for these crimes with out making sure this phone book even belong to him? You now claim that there were similarities in the writing, but how did you determine this if you didn't examine the writing? I have NEVER lied to you Nanette, I wish I could say the same for you.

Nanette one last thing I would like to bring to your attention, in the last sentence of you statement above you quote, " Just be warned, it only makes him look like a bigger liar with each false story that he tells, and that doesn't hold well for his case." Since you at least recognize the fact that this is MY CASE, what gives you the right to present my case to anyone? The documents I provided you with were for writing comparisons to the Zodiac letters, not for you to go presenting my case to whomever you want. Do you do this with other clients?


From this point on I am making it very clear to you Nanette Barto, you DO NOT have the right to present MY CASE to anyone! You do not represent me, or MY CASE, in any manner. You no longer have the right to use any documents that I provided you with pertaining to this case, which includes your website, and any other places on the Internet.


If you don't think your actions are going to have any effect on your career, you are more foolish that I thought....
jbradfield66

Registered:
Posts: 112
Reply with quote  #134 
In typical terryb fashion he obliquely hints at some sinister conspiracy or cover-up. Now he's suggesting that Dennis may be hiding something and is implying that he was involved in killings. That dumb-fuck posted this on nanette's board:

"I found it interesting in the Aphrodite Jones video that Kaufman said that Jack told him that; "the only way they were gonna get along was if he/Kaufman went out and killed something." Perhaps Dennis knows more than he really wants to say."


http://nanetteb.websitetoolbox.com.nyud.net/post/show_single_post?pid=1273699010&postcount=59

Care to elaborate terryb? Provide some details, a little clarity to your accusations? Just the same routine from this dumbass.

What a piece of shit this clown is. Oh, and nanette is back to banning anyone who asks her questions again. Just a couple of arrogant dirtbags jerking each other off over there.
jbradfield66

Registered:
Posts: 112
Reply with quote  #135 
Now, in addition to all his other baseless accusations terryb is accusing me of being a liar on nanette's board. Of course, I can't respond because she's blocked me. She can't handle any questions at all. That's how you know she's a fraud. She can't deal with any scrutiny and only allows sycophants like terry to post. So, terryb, you spineless twat, just show me one lie. Just one. I guran-fucking-tee you can't. Same shit over and over, once you're backed into a corner all you can do is starting making accusations. Grow a pair, or have you been chemically castrated by the courts?
Previous Topic | Next Topic
Print
Reply


Create your own forum with Website Toolbox!