Message Board
Register  |   |   |  Calendar
 
 
 


Reply
  Author   Comment   Page 1 of 5      1   2   3   4   Next   »
dennislkaufman

Avatar / Picture

Moderator
Registered:
Posts: 558
Reply with quote  #1 
Lee Briesemeister who is an employee that works in the photo department at Wal Mart has been working on the photo I believe to be Elizabeth Short that was on Jack's film. One of the things that Lee did that I thought was impressive was, he took Elizabeth Shorts mug shot (image #4) and changed the expression on her face similar to the expression in the blurred photo that we found on Jack's film (image #5). Then he took the image and tilted it back to about the same angle that the burred photo was taken from (image #3). Then he cut the image in half and combined it with the blurred image on Jack's film. (image #1) Then a close up of the combined images you can really see how everything matches up. (image #2)

Attached Images
Click image for larger version - Name: 0314002249a_(2).jpg, Views: 595, Size: 202.96 KB  Click image for larger version - Name: 0314002251_(2).jpg, Views: 298, Size: 120.82 KB  Click image for larger version - Name: ElizabethShort_0002.jpg, Views: 511, Size: 139.92 KB  Click image for larger version - Name: beth_7.jpg, Views: 116, Size: 15.42 KB  Click image for larger version - Name: 0314002300_(2).jpg, Views: 129, Size: 170.08 KB 

Sloth

Registered:
Posts: 149
Reply with quote  #2 
which of these pics came from jack's roll?
dennislkaufman

Avatar / Picture

Moderator
Registered:
Posts: 558
Reply with quote  #3 
Sloth, the above post should be easier to follow now...
Skeptic

Registered:
Posts: 58
Reply with quote  #4 
You are comparing a modified version of the JT photo that has been superimposed with the ES photo. Of course the features are going to match because you are essentially comparing a photo against itself.
BARman

Registered:
Posts: 255
Reply with quote  #5 
Well, there goes that. Damnit, I thought it was too eerie to be that easy.

Oh well, I tried anyway.

-Edit-
Here's the best I could enhance the original.



It still looks eerily similar. And, you can almost see her mouth hanging open and the teeth inside. Or, maybe I'm wigging. LOL.

But I have to hand it to Dennis, this is definitely very interesting. Interesting enough to explore further, for sure.
catseye

Registered:
Posts: 1,509
Reply with quote  #6 
Dennis, briefly off topic, but have you seen your numbers lately on the main page? I hadn't seen the main page for awhile but it was 50,000 some months back. They had ceased functioning when trouble with the site/MB, down and all last year but now, your up to almost 200,000! Twitter rules!
__________________
Kaufman Solved Zodiac Killer 2010, FBI Agrees w/ Barto reports 2010. Cases will close 2011 & ciphers/letters decodings will lock the doors!
Believer

Registered:
Posts: 12
Reply with quote  #7 
Why does this whole thing reek of Hodel? Is this where Dennis got the idea? Not even originial.
These pictures show nothing. Who knows if they even came off any film JT had...the "proof" on this site is laughable to put it mildly.
catseye

Registered:
Posts: 1,509
Reply with quote  #8 
Bye, believer.
__________________
Kaufman Solved Zodiac Killer 2010, FBI Agrees w/ Barto reports 2010. Cases will close 2011 & ciphers/letters decodings will lock the doors!
Believer

Registered:
Posts: 12
Reply with quote  #9 
When in the face of critism, you fail to provide proof (or merely a half-way educated statement). Catseye, you better get home to your Snackwells and talk to your cats.

P.s. The first line in this thread maybe the funniest thing I have ever read...walmart photo technicians as Dennis' photo analysis experts and you as the lead investigator! Where is Barney Fife?
Tamoose53

Registered:
Posts: 641
Reply with quote  #10 
Well, Believer, I don't agree with your conclusion, but I understand it. I don't think you should be banned for disagreeing. If you go to personal attacks, well thats a different thing.

As far as the film that Dennis has...it has been chronicled (if Im not mistaken),from the time he discovered it, to where it is now. He has had expert analysis done by a guy fron NAU in Arizona, and not just WALMART! I think you have to understand that Dennis has put EVERYTHING into this, including his own money, and I'm quite sure he has to do what he can afford to do, thus the Walmart connection.

[I]One other thing to keep in mind Believer....the FBI is on this case, it is an open investigation, they know Dennis, his background, all the dirt that has been flung his way, etc etc, and the case remains open,active, and the ONLY Zodiac case open, and have taken his evidence very seriously. Those are the facts, they cannot be disputed, and is the bottom line. If Dennis is wrong, Jack Tarrance isn't Zodiac, or the BD killer, so be it. But you wouldn't be here looking if something hadn't caught your attention.[/B]
Catseye, not sure why you ban so quickly??
Believer

Registered:
Posts: 12
Reply with quote  #11 
Who says the FBI is investigating Dennis' claims? Dennis? Catseye? Barto?
The Zodiac case is open, but not because of Dennis' claims.
Tamoose53

Registered:
Posts: 641
Reply with quote  #12 
BARman, I about crapped myself when I saw your comparisons above!! I didn't realize either what was going on until Skeptic pointed it out! But regardless, these photos still have a serious story to tell and definitely warrant further investigation.
dennislkaufman

Avatar / Picture

Moderator
Registered:
Posts: 558
Reply with quote  #13 
Barman, it seem's like there should be much more interest in these photo's, I am certain that they are Elizabeth Short. I can see the few remaining teeth and the jaw is hanging down. Her head appears to be strapped down with a belt, and the expression on her face looks as if she is in terror.

Catseye please don't get off topic in this thread, I believe these photo's extremely important and should be looked into as they could be the smoking gun in the Black Dahlia murder.

Believer stated

P.s. The first line in this thread maybe the funniest thing I have ever read...walmart photo technicians as Dennis' photo analysis experts and you as the lead investigator! Where is Barney Fife?

I didn't go to Wal Mart to look for a photo technichian, I went there to get some pictures developed which included the original 110 negatives that Stephen Dewhurst developed. The person working in the photo department had some good idea's with comparing these photo's with Elizabeth Short. I don't give a shit if this guy worked at Jack in the Box, he did some good work on the comparison.
curious_one

Registered:
Posts: 18
Reply with quote  #14 
i seen the photo's
__________________
--the truthe is, my mind just wunders
Tamoose53

Registered:
Posts: 641
Reply with quote  #15 
Believer, say what you want, I really don't give a rats ass, but I know what I know. I always want to hear the facts from the horses mouth,...I called the FBI myself, thats all I needed to hear. Call them non-believer, see what they tell you.............

And you're saying the case is "open but not because of Dennis's claims"?? Are you crazy?? You and catseye been sippin some of grampas old cough medicine together??! Why the HELL would the FBI be investigating Jack Tarrance if it were not for Dennis Kaufman??! Come on believer, you are saying some really STUPID crap here!

For the life of me, I cannot understand what is wrong with some people. I understand curiousity, I understand wanting facts, evidence, etc , but to say the FBI is investigating JT and it had nothing to do with Dennis.....ok......whatever you say believer....cooo kooo coo kooo
Previous Topic | Next Topic
Print
Reply


Create your own forum with Website Toolbox!