Message Board
Register  |   |   |  Calendar
 
 
 


Note: This topic is locked. No new replies will be accepted.


Reply
  Author   Comment   Page 2 of 9      Prev   1   2   3   4   5   Next   »
DiamondD

Avatar / Picture

Moderator
Registered:
Posts: 716
Reply with quote  #16 
ORIGINALLY POSTED BY 340CYPHER;

This on CNN;

http://cbs13.com/local/zodiac.dna.tests.2.820165.html

jim

Registered:
Posts: 35
Reply with quote  #17 
how cheap does one to have to be to reuse stamps and envelopes? come on people.

jvince1

Registered:
Posts: 5
Reply with quote  #18 
the dna testing process is quite tine consuming unless you have blood then it can still take weeks
mrsweeza

Registered:
Posts: 36
Reply with quote  #19 
Quote:
Originally Posted by denniskaufman
Mrsweeza, the DNA from two different people was on three of the four envelopes I provided the FBI. Are you telling me that Jack licked the stamps and envelopes, then decided he didn't need them so he kept the to use at a later time. Sometime later someone else decides they need a stamp and envelope so they lick the same stamp and the same envelope and I receive them in the mail with a letter from Jack. This happened on three different occasions because the DNA from two people was on three of the envelopes and stamps.

Mrsweeza, this is ridiculous, maybe you need to go back over to Tom Voigt's message board because I think you are here to try and disrupt this board.


Have I EVER been mean to you? No. Was my statement disregarding your statements? Again, NO. Have I ever insulted you? Never.

I was QUITE SIMPLY explaining it IS possible for TWO sets of DNA to be on a stamp by accident. I was NOT giving YOUR CASE as an example, just stating it is possible for there to be cross contamination on an envelope. BTW, cross contamination with DNA present can result from more then just licking an envelope, but that's nit picking.

Again, I was pointing something out about a scientific reality, so please show how that was contrary to your statement. I never discounted it or said it was not possible, now did I?
solanoraised

Registered:
Posts: 3
Reply with quote  #20 
Can anyone post ahead of time if Dennis is appearing on TV so as we can watch the show? [smileyface]
jcocker

Registered:
Posts: 40
Reply with quote  #21 
Well, if the hood is good, I bet there is blood DNA on it! Maybe some of Jack's DNA inside. Something to test there. If one would give up that hood. (CHILL) DNA on that knife to. I don't know if I would give anything up. Wonder what it would cost to do it without FBI help.

Still no news on D.B. Cooper. Finger prints and DNA! Our FBI. Going on two months.
Link

Registered:
Posts: 215
Reply with quote  #22 
Honestly guys, Why would the FBI take time out to comment just to satisfy this web sites curiosity!???

The answers will come out when they come out.

__________________
Just a thought...Link
dennislkaufman

Avatar / Picture

Moderator
Registered:
Posts: 558
Reply with quote  #23 
Channel 13 in Sacramento will have some updates on the investigation tonight at 10 P.M.
jimmy54

Registered:
Posts: 143
Reply with quote  #24 
Here's the link:

http://cbs13.com/local/zodiac.suspect.killings.2.841657.html


This is getting good...


P.S. - I'll have to rereview Dennis's information, but I wonder if he knows of any typewriter that Jack possessed, as that could be matched to the typewritten letter they mentioned in this clip.


Registered:
Posts: N/A
Reply with quote  #25 
So Sonoma County had the knife from 2002-2007, did nothing with it, then just returned it to Dennis?
bmallard

Registered:
Posts: 29
Reply with quote  #26 
Was the knife turned over to them by dennis, is that how he got it back?
dennislkaufman

Avatar / Picture

Moderator
Registered:
Posts: 558
Reply with quote  #27 
Here is a link to a newspaper in Seguin Texas that published a story on Jack.

http://www.seguingazette.com/story.lasso?ewcd=9ef525b7feac8807
dennislkaufman

Avatar / Picture

Moderator
Registered:
Posts: 558
Reply with quote  #28 
A Riverside newspaper published a story, here is the link.
http://www.pe.com/localnews/inland/stories/PE_News_Local_E_zodiac18.46d65b1.html
nalabindi

Registered:
Posts: 32
Reply with quote  #29 
The Riverside piece is interesting and to the point re: trying to link Bates and the dna. I suppose even if it is proven Bates was murdered by JT it does not prove he was Z yet. Z may have taken credit for the murder with his later letter just to gain attention. He may have taken credit for all the murders for that matter and not be the murderer. Also true for Stine murder. While the murderer did possess his shirt piece, it does not prove Z was the murderer. It only proves HE was a murderer. Unless DNA is tied to all letters and same man. It will be interesting to see if LE irrefutably can tie any of these together for certain. Z just saying so with letters doesn't prove it.
dennislkaufman

Avatar / Picture

Moderator
Registered:
Posts: 558
Reply with quote  #30 
Nalabindi, there is enough evidence linking Jack to Zodiac even without DNA, however if Jack's DNA matches the DNA taken from the crime scene of Cheri Bates, end of story. If you still think Jack is not the zodiac, oh well! Find another hobby...
Previous Topic | Next Topic
Print
Reply


Create your own forum with Website Toolbox!