Message Board
Register  |   |   |  Calendar
 
 
 


Reply
  Author   Comment   Page 4 of 6      Prev   1   2   3   4   5   6   Next
DiamondD

Avatar / Picture

Moderator
Registered:
Posts: 716
Reply with quote  #46 
PROFILER

I call your attention to this post:


        Subject: 2009         Replies: 49
Posted By: Profiler         Views: 2,398

Quote:
Originally Posted by DiamondD
Profiler,

I do not agree with the "given up" assessment of Dennis.

He has done everything he possible can to point all fingers towards Jack. It's now up to science and due diligence to wrap this case up.
DD


"I guess I shouldnt have said given up...maybe putting less effort into the investigation.
All fingers do not point to Jack and science and due diligence will not reveal Jack as Zodiac.
As I have said, point me to one piece of evidence that even suggests Jack was Zodiac (and dont say Barto's handwriting analysis)."

What say you to this?
DD
Profiler

Registered:
Posts: 153
Reply with quote  #47 
Ah, I guess I'm missing your question here DD. My comment was after Dennis and others claimed the case solved, then said he was basically giving up and pursuing new career opportunities. So your point is....
And I will say it again, show me one piece of solid evidence.
And my last few comments have given me more info on this case and certain individuals demeanor than anything. Feel free to PM as not to hijack this thread if you wish.
dennislkaufman

Avatar / Picture

Moderator
Registered:
Posts: 558
Reply with quote  #48 
Profiler there you go with your bullshit once again! I NEVER said I was giving up! I have tried to move on from this case but that is impossible when you know the truth. If you have a suspect that fits better that Jack Tarrance then I will personally take you to the FBI and you can be the one that solves this case!
Profiler

Registered:
Posts: 153
Reply with quote  #49 
I do not have a suspect better than what you have presented with Jack Tarrance.
Tamoose53

Registered:
Posts: 641
Reply with quote  #50 
If I may interject.......

I think what Profiler wants is finality and he wants it yesterday!....Is Jack the Zodiac or not????....Why don't we have an answer yet!?!?? Dennis, you said this, Dennis you said that!!......Nanettte Barto isn't qualified enough!....There isn't one piece of evidence that points to Jack.....

Profiler, a couple points; #1 you're showing impatience to the point of ignorance; #2 Your questions are border-line antangonistic and I believe puposely; #3 if you know this case as well as you pretend to know it, you would realize that a 40 year old Cold Case is not going to be solved overnight, (unless of course Jack comes back from the dead and makes a confession), and that ain't gonna happen....so my assessment of you is this; the reason you come here is just to stir up drama, piss Dennis and Nanette off, and basically be obnoxious! I think you're just mad because dennis hasn't made an announcement yet and your tired of waiting! Come on P, be cool fool!!!
trustno1

Registered:
Posts: 141
Reply with quote  #51 
Once again, Tamoose, you took the words right out of my mind. Take care.
__________________
Sometimes my mind just wanders.
sailorrick

Registered:
Posts: 9
Reply with quote  #52 
1 Piece of evidence??? Are you blind??? This MB is full of posts with evidence that points to JT being Zodiac. I will leave it to the officials to declare the case solved, but come on, this MB is full of well presented evidence by Dennis, Miss Barto, Stephen Dewhurst and others. Much is open to interpretation, but I think it's all extremely compelling. Posting argumentative and confrontational comments is a waste of time. Lots of people doing good research work on here and I enjoy reading the information presented. We all have personal opinions, but it would be nice to see some respect for all the work that Dennis and others have put into this. If you don't agree with the evidence that's one thing - but "1 piece of evidence"? PUHLEASE, be respectful.
catseye

Registered:
Posts: 1,509
Reply with quote  #53 
profiler, sorry I didn't get back to you yet. I am busy with a project but I got to say that all of this negative energy you put out when commenting, it's a wonder why you keep coming back as I don't think it's all that healthy for you to be constantly negative. I definitely support Dennis and his efforts to show Jack is a killer and that he is now beyound just Zodiac. I can see the evidence quite clearly. I can see that these pictures on the roll are decades old as I have decades old color negatives and B&Ws that are family heirlooms. In what looks to be a double exposure on color film, I see a scared little girl being violently handled by someone. In all that Dennis has presented here, this one picture gives me the chills. I believe that this is among many compelling pieces of evidence that Jack is a criminal and it's hard to fathom why he was never arrested for his crimes.
__________________
Kaufman Solved Zodiac Killer 2010, FBI Agrees w/ Barto reports 2010. Cases will close 2011 & ciphers/letters decodings will lock the doors!
trustno1

Registered:
Posts: 141
Reply with quote  #54 
Ms. Barto....It's people like you that prove time and time again that the best way to 'educate' yourself is by going at it with a hands-on type of approach. Over and over again you see someone who is a Harvard graduate, used to give their expert opinion on whatever is being discussed (I'm referring to the news media). In my opinion, these people do not know sh*t simply because they have had no experience living and dealing with the real world. I have been working in the field of electrical/electronics design, troubleshooting and, repair for over 30 years now and, in that time I have met many people working in the same technical field who had degrees and certificates from well known tech. schools and, to make a long story short, these guys couldn't even solder 2 copper wires together, let alone, know how to read a schematic diagram. Your approach at higher learning for you was,I believe, the correct path for you to take because, it allowed you to experience life (real life) and by doing this, it assisted you in making the learning process much more easy. I may be way off base or slightly out of line here by giving my opinion regarding your education and, if I am, I apologize. As far as I'm concerned, you know your stuff and, I would rather listen to your opinion, over some stuffy over educated windbag that needs instuctions on how to tie his shoes. Keep up the excellent work and, take care.
__________________
Sometimes my mind just wanders.
trustno1

Registered:
Posts: 141
Reply with quote  #55 
I feel I should apologize to anyone on this MB who might happen to be Harvard graduates. My comments about certain people who went this university and now consider themselves experts on everything was rather rude. I am sure that there are numerous Harvard graduates throughout the world who conduct themselves with proper dignity and, consideration of others. Now I need to get back to the topic of this thread. ....P.S. I'm not retracting my post commenting on Nanette B's path to educate herself her own way, to become the 'real expert' that she is. Now we rejoin the thread topic already in progress.
__________________
Sometimes my mind just wanders.
Tamoose53

Registered:
Posts: 641
Reply with quote  #56 
Whats going on Nanette?? I haven't been following close enough I guess to know what is happening....
BARman

Registered:
Posts: 255
Reply with quote  #57 
The Lipstick Killer was 1945-1946. Was color film available this far back?
dennislkaufman

Avatar / Picture

Moderator
Registered:
Posts: 558
Reply with quote  #58 
Color film came out in 1942.
sixtieschick

Registered:
Posts: 246
Reply with quote  #59 
Only picture I have been able to find so far is one of him going out the window:

http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.corbisimages.com/images/67/C8018A9D-4D2B-4D13-B277-9AB292854469/U806766ACME.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.corbisimages.com/Enlargement/U806766ACME.html&usg=__Xuk36IsY5tJKRT8ZKExcs7ln_Kg=&h=480&w=361&sz=51&hl=en&start=1&um=1&itbs=1&tbnid=bwOuyRqoxNYepM:&tbnh=129&tbnw=97&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dheirens%2Breenactment%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26sa%3DG%26tbs%3Disch:1
sixtieschick

Registered:
Posts: 246
Reply with quote  #60 
It was a real letter found on Hierens at the time of his arrest. There are opposing ideas to what the letter means. Some see it referring to a real person Heirens knew, while others see it as a manifestation of an alter ego, since he later said he made the whole thing up.

http://somethingsaintfunny.blogspot.com/2009/07/william-george-heirens-was-he-lipstick.html

http://books.google.com/books?id=bnnZo5NBBTwC&pg=PA186&lpg=PA186&dq=george+m.s.+heirens&source=bl&ots=YNHUP5Qa59&sig=DmTmACkL_CCYHW3cSl2jC5RbeSo&hl=en&ei=Y-YOTNebFZGCNNKOhfkM&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=7&ved=0CDIQ6AEwBg#v=onepage&q=george%20m.s.%20heirens&f=false

this second link has three prompts to view three different areas of the book which mention this George.

I am not sure if a copy of the actual letter is available.
Previous Topic | Next Topic
Print
Reply


Create your own forum with Website Toolbox!