Message Board
Register  |   |   |  Calendar
 
 
 


Reply
  Author   Comment   Page 6 of 9     «   Prev   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   Next
TerryB

Registered:
Posts: 924
Reply with quote  #76 
Here is an important link to a 2001 youtube video which features Detective Lou Smit. I greatly admire his reasoning. It's a good video to review. He clearly shows that her murder was premeditated and involved a lot of planning:





I hope the link works OK.

__________________
One small bit of info might make all the difference.
TerryB

Registered:
Posts: 924
Reply with quote  #77 
A careful study of the Karr/Tracey emails reveals that there were at least two different authors of the emails from the Karr camp. One strongly hints at being JT, complete with hints about having heart disease. Reading and studying all of the Karr emails is a painful process to do because not only are they sickening but also they're very redundant. Most of the Karr messages are exact re-posting copies. How LE missed these features is very suspicious indeed.


BTW, I point out that this person that posted in these threads under the handle Praxis is using a play on the handle 'Daxis' in the Karr emails. The points that Praxis tries to make are outdated lies. These same group of lies are exactly what the killers camp would rather have the public believe. John Mark Karr can still be convicted as a co-conspirator in the Ramsey case, the Karr/Tracey emails hold all of the evidence to win a felony conviction of John Mark Karr.

The murder of JonBenet Ramsey was a very deliberate act that involved lots of planning. The pineapple evidence and the ransom note stand as solid proof that her murder was deliberate. No one wrote that ransom note after the girl was viciously killed. Her murder was no accident, the totality of the evidence proves this. The crime scene was over-done with a lot of peculiar evidence, the same of which is Zodiac Jack 101. The Ramsey's weren't dumb enough to write that note, call the cops and leave her body to be found in the basement. Most of the dumbest of criminals wouldn't do such a thing. Think!

__________________
One small bit of info might make all the difference.
TerryB

Registered:
Posts: 924
Reply with quote  #78 
Once you realize that the ransom note pages have all of the nuances it does, nuances that repeat, you'll then realize that a lot of planning went into it's assembly. While the Zodiac killer documents and other crime documents have JT initial inclusions, there are far more of them integrated into the JonBenet Ramsey ransom note. All of the other peculiar nuances directly compare to the Zodiac killer documents as well as 1946 Chicago Lipstick, Black Dahlia and other sprees documents.

The ransom note is so "overdone" with the JT initial clues that it would be humorous if it were not for the fact that it's part of the very viscous and premeditated murder of a child. It's also overdone with several other pointed things like the improperly placed; approximately 30ea capital F's and W's. This of course strongly hints or points the finger at Fleet White. Because of that fact; ransom3sg notes2.GIF  I give White the benefit of a doubt, even though I'm troubled by all of his post-murder behavior. White was said to have noted the 'structure' of the ransom note the morning of the 26th. While there are too many people taking what's written in the note as credible, damn few have studied the structure.


__________________
One small bit of info might make all the difference.
TerryB

Registered:
Posts: 924
Reply with quote  #79 
Every time I glance at the Ramsey ransom note, I notice yet another peculiarity. 

For instance, just today: Look at the structure of the word 'under' on the third line of the last page. The 'e' is shaped like a font type of 't'. This is another one of several reasons why it's clear that the note was composed before the murder. Taken phonetically it would sound like a German (or Danish etc)type of a pronunciation, such as: un-ter. Get it? Many of these type of clues are found throughout the phoney baloney ransom note.

Former Boulder prosecutor Alex Hunter referred to the JonBenet' Ramsey ransom note as a fanciful document. That's an accurate understatement, IMHO.

That ransom note is loaded with many peculiarities, as was the whole crime scene. Most criminals would try to leave as little evidence as possible, the opposite of that is true in this particular case.

Notice all the spacing he put around the word 'under', the same of which makes it kinda stand out.

__________________
One small bit of info might make all the difference.
TerryB

Registered:
Posts: 924
Reply with quote  #80 
One of Zodiac Jacks favorite tricks was to structure his work like a dramatic staircase or cascade. So, starting at the word "stand" and reading down at an angle you get 'stand back under the brain'. If I'm correct on this, it strongly hints that the blow to the back of her head was planned out and stated on the ransom note. (?) If you add to that the last sentence on the previous page, it would read: 'Follow our instructions and you stand back under the brain.' Perhaps these were emphatic instructions given to the person doing the hit on this little girl?

Otherwise, I view the phoney ransom note statements as being highly deceptive and misleading. There are other things on the thing that I think hint that the girl is already dead, sorry to say.

( I edited this post to correct an error where I incorrectly wrote "start" instead of "stand".)

__________________
One small bit of info might make all the difference.
TerryB

Registered:
Posts: 924
Reply with quote  #81 
Here is an annotated copy of the "Screaming Boy" image found on Chris Busch's wall in his bedroom death scene as it relates to the 1976/77 OCCK case, said to resemble child victim Mark Stebbins. It has JT's initial clues all over it. How the cops couldn't have realized this, is not credible.

I still admire Nanette Barto for connecting these crimes in the first place. I still consider Dennis Kaufman as a friend. bilde2.JPG 
The Zodiac killers crosshairs symbol is on the earlobe, structured exactly the same way Zodiac Jack made many of them. I view them as having been structured as a compound or combination JT initial clue. 


__________________
One small bit of info might make all the difference.
TerryB

Registered:
Posts: 924
Reply with quote  #82 
The JT initial clue on the drawing is what I refer to as a "compound" or "combination" JT, they're found on documents as early as the 1946 Chicago Lipstick murders. The Ramsey ransom note is saturated with the initials JT in many variations.
__________________
One small bit of info might make all the difference.
TerryB

Registered:
Posts: 924
Reply with quote  #83 
I was reviewing Michael Tracey's video, "JonBenet's America (1998) and noticed that her funeral was held at Peachtree Presbyterian (in Atlanta GA, I think it was).  It hit me that I had found this document in the FBI's Zodiac killer FOIA files. If you understand the "Order out of Chaos" concept written about by former FBI profiler and author John Douglas, this connectivity has a valid basis. If I'm correct on this, it indicates that the Zodiac killer had these "poetic" (for lack of a better term) notions as early as 1981!
These are the most incredible aspects of these most definitely connected crimes. 

On this copy I missed marking the h and t in peachtree as being JT inital clues, the h is identical also to the ones found on the Red Phantom letter in the Zodiac killer case. viewer13b.PNGBTW, that address is Savannah College of Art and Design.

Mysteriously, a copy of Douglas' book "Mindhunter" was found in the Ramsey home, as well as a book in Danish, as well as a lot of other very strange items.


__________________
One small bit of info might make all the difference.
TerryB

Registered:
Posts: 924
Reply with quote  #84 
Please go back and review all of the annotated documents I've posted in this thread, I think you'll be stunned. I work these cases from documents already in the public domain.

Please check my other threads too.

__________________
One small bit of info might make all the difference.
TerryB

Registered:
Posts: 924
Reply with quote  #85 
Back to the Karr emails: Tracey reported that there was a lapse in the emails where he hadn't heard from Karr for quite awhile and that when they started up again; Karr then changed his tune from " he was with her when she died" to saying "he killed her". I think this is another important clue that shows that Karr was being coached.

The main point that I've made about those emails is irrefutable, there's clear evidence of a second author involved in the composition of the Daxis/Karr emails.

Karr wasn't traceable until he got the disposable cell phone. Karr started out with an untraceable server, yet he walked right into being captured? Karr even said that he'd never heard of an "untraceable" cell phone. I say that it was all part of the plan from the Daxis/Karr camp.

In the emails, the second authors writings are far different in sentence structure than Karr's. There are several characteristics about the second author emails that set them apart from Karr's way of stating things. This second author makes several screwy remarks, remarks that depart from Karr's earlier redundant and restricted "copy and paste"messages. Go Look!

It's not credible that Law Enforcement missed these things!

__________________
One small bit of info might make all the difference.
TerryB

Registered:
Posts: 924
Reply with quote  #86 
And BTW, the odds of an accidental meeting of Karr and Sandrock in Paris are astronomical. It tells me that Karr intentionally intercepted Sandrock or they were co-conspirators, this second scenario isn't likely but possible. Was Karr really ever actually in Paris at that particular time? I assume that Sandrock has been cleared on this particular angle?

In any event, it shows that Karr was set on interjecting himself into the JonBenet Ramsey murder. I think that the goal was to get Karr picked up much earlier on, had LE and Tracey tried to do so earlier. They treated the situation like they were afraid that they would lose Karr if they pushed too hard. I don't think they could have lost Karr no matter what was said to him.

Karr and Krebs served the same function: Keep everyone thinking that it was a sex crime gone bad, when the evidence clearly shows that it was a highly planned out and brutal murder. Think!

__________________
One small bit of info might make all the difference.
TerryB

Registered:
Posts: 924
Reply with quote  #87 
Regarding my post #81, the drawing of the screaming boy: There are many JT nuances integrated on the face, inverted combination JT's being the most common. There's no way around this very important piece of evidence related to the OCCK case.

A clearer copy or the original will probably reveal several more.

__________________
One small bit of info might make all the difference.
TerryB

Registered:
Posts: 924
Reply with quote  #88 
The Zodiac killers cross-hairs symbol is on the earlobe of the drawing!
__________________
One small bit of info might make all the difference.
TerryB

Registered:
Posts: 924
Reply with quote  #89 
This is a photo of JonBenet's skull. The coroners report says she was already dead when this blow was delivered to her head. A blow so hard that it cracked her skull all the way around to above her eye socket and drove the rectangular piece of bone into her skull! So why would former detective Steve Thomas keep promoting the theory about a bed-wetting rage and staging?

As top detective Lou Smit said; "no one wrote that ransom note after the killing, they'd have too much adrenaline to do so".

The pineapple evidence is also proof that her murder was premeditated. The Ramsey's would have no reason to lie about it, even if they did feed it too her, they could simply say so if it were true.

The fact that the sharpie used to compose the ransom note was from an much older dye lot also proves that the crime was planned out. The rest of the sharpies were much newer.

jonbenetskull1.jpg
Here's a drawing of her body with the narrow black gaffers tape over her mouth, the tape was never sourced at the crime scene. Tape was said to be cut, not torn. Body posed like Black Dahlia and Paul Stine. I think the tape was used to mimic the Black Dahlia victims mouth. Ligature on ankles and wrist were loose. Garrote was more like a noose, than how a garrote is, a garrote is tightened by a twisting action. More proof that this was an intentional murder. Linguistics of ransom note hint that she was already dead, many other cryptic hints are found on the ransom note.
posed with tape.JPG


__________________
One small bit of info might make all the difference.
TerryB

Registered:
Posts: 924
Reply with quote  #90 
Correction: I just noticed the drawing of the heart on her hand of that drawing. The sketch wasn't made by me, however; I added the black tape portion over this drawing to show how the victim might have looked when her body was found.

In this thread is an actual photo where I outlined the actual image on her hand. It has a very tiny drawing of a heart on it and is part of a rather larger backwards J, the same of which is Zodiac Jack 101. Jack Tarrance was said to have a small red outline heart tattoo on his arm. I think that the  drawing on the victims hand was a mimic of, or hints at the shape of an arm. J-hooks are readily findable on all of the murder case documents of similar crimes that I firmly believed to be linked.

I suspect that this image portion of the ransom note serves as a tombstone hint, notice how the 't' is like it's planted like a tombstone, sorry to say. The ransom note has several 'death' hints, in several ways. t-tombstone.GIF 


__________________
One small bit of info might make all the difference.
Previous Topic | Next Topic
Print
Reply


Create your own forum with Website Toolbox!