Message Board
Register  |   |   |  Calendar
 
 
 


Reply
  Author   Comment   Page 8 of 9     «   Prev   5   6   7   8   9   Next
TerryB

Registered:
Posts: 925
Reply with quote  #106 
So how many additional messages was he trying to hint at or convey the day the murder was done? You can add to the above 27 plus messages these things too:

-a drawing on her hand which mimics the shape of an arm with a small red outline type of tattoo on it with the Zodiac killer cross-hairs where the hand would be

-a tea bag in a glass that says he was relaxed during the whole thing (which is probably false)

-the pineapple was fed to her that night (which is probably false)

- she was told to expect a visit from Santa (which was deceptive, of course)

-a 'beaver hairs' message (linked to OCCK)

- phoney sexual bondage ligatures

-black gaffers tape on her mouth hints at the Black Dahlia case

-the 'hands of the clock' D on the third page along with 1997 on the first page (the time/date stamp already on the list)

-a wiped down Maglite left at the scene

-"We area group of individuals that represent a small foreign faction" (yeah, right! or yeah right?)

-add another 'Jack" clue with the mysteriously placed stuffed toy rabbit left at her grave

This puts us at no less than 36 messages integrated into this crime! It's hard for me to believe that there are only a few people like myself that recognizes these things. Only the 1960's California Zodiac killer fits these crimes in every single way, add the outrageous number of JT clues and that puts firm and well founded suspicion on Jack Tarrance when adding the totality of all of the evidence. 


__________________
One small bit of info might make all the difference.
TerryB

Registered:
Posts: 925
Reply with quote  #107 
I posted the following information here that has to do with the 1976/77 OCCK case and 1978 Chris Busch case because I firmly believe that it directly relates to the Ramsey case as well as the Zodiac killer cases, Degnan case, BD etc:The "Allen letter to Dr Danto" in the OCCK case is another example of Zodiac Jack's sick work. I tallied up some keywords to show that; like the Ramsey ransom note, it also used violent words, keywords, hints and intentionally misspelled words repeatedly. I suspect that by using the name Allen, it served as a subtle reference to Arthur Leigh Allen, a named and later cleared suspect in the Zodiac killer cases. I also suspect that Oakland county may reference to Oakland CA but I have no circle of evidence on this.... at this time. It's pretty easy to tell that the syntax is phoney and that it's mainly a device that acts to taunt everyone. He played a little game with 'juilty/guilty' which is probably a snide reference to victim Jill Robinson. He made several thinly veiled and snide and vicious remarks that are readily detectible, despite his overall pleas for help and leniency. And, true to form, he insisted that he gets his seemingly goofy "coded" message printed in the newspaper.

He used: 5ea kill, 4ea killed, 2ea killer, death once, die twice, dead once, code once, suicide once, time once, slave twice,  punish once and monster once. He also used phrases whips me and beat's me, etc.

I've been certain of this being another Zodiac killer crime spree for quite some time. Now that I've finally got a good look at the Chris Busch death scene, I can state with perfect certainty that it was the work of Zodiac Jack. I point out the fact that most of these hints are somewhat subtle and that this would tend to diffuse any suspicion that it might be the work of a copy cat. The Zodiac killer cross-hairs on the earlobe of the screaming boy drawing are of course the "smoking gun" evidence, that is something that I'm sorry to admit that I was late in making the discovery of. The compound and subtle JT clues on the face of the drawing fortify my claims regarding the same clues on the Ramsey ransom note, Zodiac documents, Degnan ransom note and others. The Degnan ransom note was also left despite the fact that the Degnan girl was already dead and dismembered by the time the note was discovered.

__________________
One small bit of info might make all the difference.
TerryB

Registered:
Posts: 925
Reply with quote  #108 
This report is a work in progress by me:

                                 Sequence of steps the killer(s) most likely had to take the night of the murder of JonBenet'

-quickly and quietly get into the house (he/they probably had a key)

-carefully check up on the other family members to make sure that they were all asleep ( this probably forced the killer(s) to wait around awhile to make sure they were asleep)

-dogear and accentuate the books in the den (if true?)

-odd items had to be carried in and placed (but probably after the killing was over maybe some before?) pineapple(if truly reported?), bag of rope, 2ea books (if truly reported?) gaffers tape, ligature cords, ransom note ( probably carried in a cardboard tube)an older Sharpie marker, maybe a drop cloth was used under the victim?, locate a box of tissues, maybe a stun gun was brought in?, Mag-lite (unless it was already in the house) a strip of cut black gaffers tape, perhaps the entire roll was carried in?, killer(s) probably carried weapons to the scene like a gun and a knife

-acquire over-sized Wednesday panties from drawer, the same of which shows familiarity with drawer contents

-place bag of rope in spare bedroom(as in OCCK related Chris Busch's closet)

-construct so-called garrote, it was more of a noose with a special wrap to the handle that required advanced knowledge to construct

-make sure flashlight is 'at hand', if that was the device that broke her skull and it probably was the device used(?)

-place the drop cloth (if this was the case, my guess is that it was most likely the case?)

-set up the phoney and deceptive suitcase with the Dr Seuss book and duvet inside which tends to show care for the victim when the rest of the evidence shows clearly otherwise

-carefully remove the victim from her bed  and carry her down to the basement ,most likely she was still fast asleep

*-quickly strangle on her lower throat and molest victim adding marks to her face, back and leg, rupture her hymen with tip of paintbrush handle, heavily strangle to kill her on the upper throat, obtain Mag-lite and bash in her skull. (*sequence may vary but this would be 7 to 8 steps to do this part of the crime) the twisted in hair strands indicates a rather swift execution of these steps

-carefully draw the prime JT clue on her hand that has a backwards stemmed J with a small outline red heart near the top, then a Zodiac killer cross-hairs where the hand would be,  this was probably constructed to resemble an arm, JT's arm

-get black gaffers, cut a strip and place it on her mouth

-clean her body up

-dress her with over-sized 'Wednesday' underwear etc

-add phoney ligatures

-wrap her in a blanket and place her in the little storage room, posed her with her arms over her head

-maybe add the phoney footprints too, maybe not?

-double back upstairs and place phoney ransom note on the stairs

-place the bowl of pineapple, glass with teabag and facial tissue on the table (if this was all true and not a lie from the police?)

-lock the door on the way out and slip away into the night unobserved taking certain and crime scene specific items with

-perhaps wait till 911 call and try to inject a phoney audio signal at the end of the call, which won't work because the hang-up will remove "battery' current from the line (Why did the cops try so hard for this artifact when the noise level was far too high?)

-it makes sense that the rather sophisticated ransom note was carefully constructed long before the actual commission of the killing, it certainly wasn't composed afterwards

All of the above took at least 27 steps to accomplish, killer(s) probably stayed near the scene until sometime the next morning......or  maybe not? The above steps carefully assumes that the pineapple was already fed to the victim as early as 4:30 PM, otherwise a much longer wait would have been required  before she can be killed.










__________________
One small bit of info might make all the difference.
TerryB

Registered:
Posts: 925
Reply with quote  #109 
                                 Sensible lines of reasoning:

I've posted that the first thing to recognize in the murder of JonBenet' is the sheer brutality of the murder as well as the 'overkill' of the victim and the 'overdone' amount of evidence that says the same thing.

The second most important thing is to realize is that Christmas is a long day for a 6 year old child and most every child that age is gonna be 'zonked out' at the end of that long day. Once asleep, they will be almost impossible to wake up. If forced to wake up, they might cry and moan. I firmly assert that all crime scene assessment must have this point firmly in mind.

I know that in the confusion the followed, that John Ramsey made the statement that had it been Santa Claus that woke her up, that she would have "jumped out of bed and followed him to the mall". I strongly disagree with that statement because I think that he didn't think that through thoroughly. Had she been very awake, maybe that might be true but not when she was undoubtedly very sleepy. Furthermore; kids that age that are as precocious and as smart as his daughter was, know that their neighbor was "dressing up" as Santa Claus. I'd bet that she knew that that guy was a little spooky and a little "off". It's well established that JonBenet was very bright.

The third prime thing to notice is how much of the victims hair is entwined in the noose and noose handle, this clearly shows a hurried attack and that it was not a slow and careful application of the noose. Then her skull was shattered by a massive blow that was certainly overkill.

Now start adding to the above  all of the crazy evidence and you'll know it was the work of a sadist.

The above is the only sensible 'foundation' of reasoning that's formed by the evidence.

__________________
One small bit of info might make all the difference.
TerryB

Registered:
Posts: 925
Reply with quote  #110 
The forth thing to notice is the sheer number of JT's that are integrated into the phoney Ramsey ransom note. I say phoney because it was left despite the fact that the killer(s) knew for certain that the girl was dead. Early crime documents have JT's integrated into the documents but not as heavily as the phoney Ramsey ransom note.

Every so often I'll review something about the cases just to see if I might have missed something. Just yesterday I reviewed A&E's presentation 'The Zodiac Killer' and came to the part where John Shimoda of the US Postal Service was pointing out that the Zodiac killer made his letter k in an unusual way. The document shown was the one where the Zodiac killer is threatening to shoot little 'kiddies' as they come bouncing off the bus. Well....that particular example is what I refer to as a compound or combination JT clue. So, I went back to the Ramsey ransom note and found that only the last example of the word 'killing' has a modified k, albeit not exactly like the way  the Zodiac one was made. I think that the one pointed out by Shimoda is a very astute observation by him, that letter k is exactly what I would expect to find. There's no doubt in my mind that it's a JT initial clue.

__________________
One small bit of info might make all the difference.
TerryB

Registered:
Posts: 925
Reply with quote  #111 
In reviewing the Zodiac killer evidence it was stated; "Why would the killer wear a hood if he planned to kill both people?" Why indeed? I'm talking about the knifing of Hartnell and Shepherd.

We know that Mageau survived his gunshot wounds and subsequently Hartnell survived his knife wounds. I think the killer had a good knowledge of human anatomy and I think he delivered knife wounds accordingly. That way Hartnell could live to report the hood. In fact Cecelia Shepherd lived long enough to describe the killer too. The result is that the hood would act to terrorize the public and bring about a more dramatic and ominous story. Otherwise you'd just have a cowardly knifing by some stray looser.


I've come to realize that the murder of JonBenet might not have gotten the killer quite what he wanted, he may have been aiming for the police to properly assess the murder and eventually attribute it to the Zodiac killer. Especially when you consider the keywords: 'Speaking, time, posession (sic) bussiness (sic) coupled with the long winded message about "she dies, she dies, she dies and the cryptic sign-off. The "By Rope" Zodiac killer threat had never happen until the viscous murder of JonBenet, not as far as the public was aware anyway. 

__________________
One small bit of info might make all the difference.
TerryB

Registered:
Posts: 925
Reply with quote  #112 
BTW, the Tracey/Karr/decemberman/Daxis emails contain ample evidence of a second author writing in the Karr camp, this second author wasn't as educated as Karr is and he intentionally misspelled words even when corrected by Tracey. He also made several screwy remarks, many of which had nothing to do with a guy Karr's age and schooling. This second author used several specific Zodiac killer and OCCK keywords and phrases. The second author made remarks about heart disease, electrocardiograms and remarks about "soon becoming silent forever". These same remarks were posted shortly before Jack Tarrance's death. He quoted Auden's 'Stop all the Clocks'.

The vast majority of the messages from the Karr camp were sickening and redundant 'copy and paste' re-postings. The prime message was to convey the notion that JonBenet's death was the result of a sexual accident, the same message conveyed by Krebs. The evidence is clear that her death was intentional.

The Karr camp made several provable lies. At least one particular statement made it clear that the Karr camp was opposed to the Ramsey's being cleared of suspicion. I'm convinced that the killers goal was steer the public's perception about the Ramsey case which might eventually affect the legal arena too.

__________________
One small bit of info might make all the difference.
TerryB

Registered:
Posts: 925
Reply with quote  #113 
I think that the strongest and most direct Zodiac killer clue on the Ramsey ransom note is (besides the keywords, missives, time/date, sign-off etc etc) on the second page where the words 'watching' over 'like' intersect. Notice how 'square' it is. If you start at the word 'The' on the seventh line and connect it diagonally to the word 'Speaking' you get: 'The Zodiac not Speaking'. This might be a hint from Zodiac Jack. I am fairly certain that the intersection was made to form the Zodiac killer cross-hairs, that seems pretty obvious from my perspective.

Edited to add: That the intersection of 'watching' over 'like' forms a JT initial clue, as well. You can also see a hint of the 'T' in S.B.T.C was structured to act as a combination JT clue. The same of which might phonetically mean: "Saved By (the) Zodiac see (see=C). This has to do with the Zodiac killer theme of him having his victims in his posession (sic) as slaves for the afterlife. Otherwise, why did he put periods in F.B.I. and S.B.T. but not behind the 'C', see? Get it?

Again; I think that the word 'that' on the 3rd line of the ransom note has the first t serving as a tombstone hint, with the flat base under the 't' being my main point. It's the only instance of the 't' being made that way. It then renders the word 'hat' too and reminds me of the rabbit hole business coupled with the mysteriously placed stuffed toy rabbit on the victims grave. I view these things a being an example of a "circle of evidence", where each item links to the rest of the items and comes 'full circle'. These things, while more subtle than other 'circles of evidence' are definitely intriguing. Things like this do tend to make it a more interesting story overall.

__________________
One small bit of info might make all the difference.
TerryB

Registered:
Posts: 925
Reply with quote  #114 
On post #111 I pointed out that I think that Zodiac Jack intentionally administered non-lethal knife wounds to Hartnell, so that he would live to report the fact that the killer wore the executioners hood with the Zodiac cross-hairs on it. This way the killer would get the full 'ominous' effect and sensational publication.

In both the OCCK and Ramsey case I think that he was after the same 'ominous' effect. Later on I'll post several points regarding this in the OCCK case, it's pretty self-evident.

In the Ramsey case the reality is that Zodiac Jack was able to exploit the sexualization of JonBenet Ramsey in order to get the full 'ominous' effect. Most of that sexualization occurred during the last year of her life. The political reality is that most people are gonna find that aspect of the case troubling, to say the least. While I've strongly pointed out the fact that a lot of planning went into the 'hit' on the Ramsey girl, which is what I think that it actually was, the information collected on the Ramsey's and their friends is pretty obvious in the content and structure of the phoney ransom note. You have the evidence that an unknown intruder slept in her bed in the Ramsey's summer home in Michigan and left behind a small suitcase and a new pair of cowboy boots. I think this clearly shows that she was being stalked. This also shows that the planning of the murder was at least a few months in advance and maybe as much a a year or two prior to her murder. If there hadn't have been the "Little Miss" beauty pageants with her being somewhat "sexualized", the case just wouldn't have ended up being a major media circus. So, my questions are: "Who was all involved in that process" and "who all ramped up the mature sexual content of pageant costumes, poise and footage?"

IMHO, the Ramsey case is exactly what the Zodiac killer threatened to do, I think he considered it his "masterpiece" that he boasted about on one or more of the later Zodiac killer documents.

__________________
One small bit of info might make all the difference.
TerryB

Registered:
Posts: 925
Reply with quote  #115 
"By Rope", this was one of the threats of the Zodiac killer made on a drawing that had the 4 threats with one in each quadrant. So, we have the mysterious deposit of rope at the 1978 Chris Busch death scene (OCCK case). We have the brown paper bag of rope found in the Ramsey's guest bedroom and a reference to a brown paper bag on the ransom note. No one knew where the rope came from. We have the mid Sept finding of the mysterious cowboy boots and suitcase at her bed in Michigan that was slept in by an intruder.

From what I can tell, July 4th was the first date that JonBenet modeled the cowboy outfit, then Nov 11th of 1996; we have the still photos of her in a jeans outfit with the rope at her feet. And, of course, the bag of rope was discovered Dec 26th of 1996.

Trigger dates for our suspect were July 4th and around Christmas.

I think that the above denotes that her stalking probably was triggered on July 4th of 1996 and so the planning could very well have begun at that point in time. I find the Nov 11th photo shoot a bit spooky and think it needs a thorough review of the facts, like: Who suggested the theme with the rope? I got the photo timeline from acandyrose but I don't fully trust that site. I've pointed out that evidence indicates that the actual target was John Ramsey, so the planning may have started much earlier and a timeline showing the acquisition of Access Graphics may be when he was targeted.

Again, the killer knowing things like the fact that the dog wasn't gonna be in the house and that they did use their alarm, were more sophisticated than getting a key to that house was.

Correction: I think that have the Nov 11th date wrong, I'll fix it later.

__________________
One small bit of info might make all the difference.
TerryB

Registered:
Posts: 925
Reply with quote  #116 
Another thing that needs pointing out is the fact that the killer(s) would have needed a fair amount of money to travel between Boulder CO and Charlevoix MI and back to a home base, most likely multiple trips too. He or they would have to have stayed in either a Hotel, Motel or trailer park. It all would have taken up a lot of time too. The fact that you have the intruder leaving a fancy new pair of cowboy boots and a tidy suitcase in the Ramsey's summer home, clearly shows that she was being stalked. Someone at her Nov 11th photo shoot made the decision to use the cowgirl and rope motif, I think that it's too much of a coincidence when you consider all of the evidence that led up to her murder.


If you can understand or appreciate how familiar I was with the overall behavioral characteristics of the Zodiac killer and the fortification the JT initial clues on the Ramsey ransom note bolstered Dennis Kaufman's claims, you can see why I was skeptical when Dennis said JT was home sick and in bed that particular Christmas. While there are few subtle crime scene clues that support the notion that someone other than Jack carried out the crime, the rest of the crime is so very much in every way Zodiac Jack 101.

What I refer to as the 'January Turning' card from the Black Dahlia case, is in my opinion the strongest single piece of evidence that Jack Tarrance was her killer, or he certainly wrote that post card, to say the least. Other 'Jack' evidence can be added to that.

I also have reasons to believe that Tarrance figured that it would have been too incredible to believe that he was involved in early crimes like the Black Dahlia case, so he fortified the linkage evidence between the Zodiac killer, OCCK and JonBenet Ramsey murder via mainly the ransom letter and the Daxis emails. So, while there are detectible linkages to these other crimes, I think he made these three murder spree links the strongest, he over-did it on the Daxis emails and he especially ramped it up when he knew he was soon gonna become "silent forever" because of his rapidly failing health.

__________________
One small bit of info might make all the difference.
TerryB

Registered:
Posts: 925
Reply with quote  #117 
One of the things that I haven't agreed with John Douglas on, is his statement as to what he thought that the age of the Zodiac Killer was. He said that he thought that the killer was a young man. I think that things like the killers reference to the Mikado and the likelihood that the Zodiac killer fashioned his motif after the 1939 movie Charlie Chan at Treasure Island, points to an older person. There are other clues that can be added to the notion of him being an older man. Also in the Lawrence Block presentation is a reference to Hebrew (Jew hint) in the "my name is" cipher, it superficially decodes to 'Kane', meaning probably the former suspect Larry Kane. The two points here are the suspects age and a joo hint (Jew hint), which occurs on the phoney 'Ed Burns's suicide note in the Black Dahlia case, that also has the 'joo' hint incorporated into it's structure. As I've pointed out before, the Ramsey ransom note also has a strong 'joo' hint on it. I have to go back over the OCCK case and the Daxis emails to see if there are any more of these same hints.
 
I've had some time to think about the recent appearance of Fleet White jr and his wife before the Boulder city council. As was pointed out at that hearing, the case in question has already been adjudicated. So why is White drawing attention to something that most people would rather downplay? Why indeed? As you know, unless you really study the Ramsey case, the Krebs factor was already downplayed by law enforcement, so why is White drawing attention to it again? My suspicion is that 'once again', the killers camp wants to reinforce the false notion that the death of JonBenet stemmed from a sexual accident. Of course, not all of us buy into that ploy but unfortunately there are people that still have it in their heads that John Ramsey was a sexual deviate, that's how the crime was primarily structured to work, IMHO. If I'm correct on this, and I think that I am, it tells that the people behind the hit on little JonBenet are still working hard to divert the case. My overview of all of this, makes me tend to think that Zodiac Jack set the whole thing up to play out the way it has. I also wonder if it hasn't dawned on the people behind it, that Zodiac Jack set them up too?

__________________
One small bit of info might make all the difference.
TerryB

Registered:
Posts: 925
Reply with quote  #118 
On the other hand......I think that the White's make a good point. They should be able to see what follow up the BPD actually did regarding Nancy Krebs. Krebs had claimed that she was in fear of reprisal from her mother and her mother's associates, yet, she then suddenly gets some courage and goes to the BPD with her account.  BTW, Hunter probably didn't know how the Daily Camera was gonna treat his interview. (?)

It's funny and sad how the perceptions of the Ramsey case are skewed from one group or community to the next. In other words, the 'take' on the crime varies amongst certain groups of people.

Did all of the improperly placed capital F's and W's on the ransom note freak Fleet White jr out? I'd say that there's a good chance of that being exactly the case. Because I recognized that the Ramsey's were 'set up', I also believe that it's very likely that Fleet White was also 'set up' but it wasn't by the Ramsey's, it came via Zodiac Jack and associates. Just who controlled Zodiac Jack is hard to say at this point in time? However; as I have said many times, the conspiracy to cover is an ongoing event that cost whomever is behind it, a lot of money every month. It's very likely that whomever controlled Krebs, also controls John Mark Karr.

Perhaps they have Fleet White jr all boxed up regarding the case, meaning he can't talk about his testimony, or clear the air regarding the suspicions that have arisen from the case. If I were him, I'd clarify the air regarding the wine cellar business, why didn't he see her body, he'd been in that room in the past? It's not likely that the LE would touch him afterwords, not from what I've seen of how they act. I hope Fleet White jr is clean in the Ramsey case, he could very well be. Clarify this situation Fleet.

__________________
One small bit of info might make all the difference.

__________________
One small bit of info might make all the difference.
TerryB

Registered:
Posts: 925
Reply with quote  #119 
Currently I've posted about the involvement of former Detective Linda Arndt. First aired on Time Tunnel on 9/17/99 was an interview where she says she "knows who killed JonBenet, that there's no doubt in her mind, etc, etc." Then she declines to name the person. Later on in the interview she makes a big deal about the 10am kidnapper call time line coming and going without any reaction from the Ramsey's. This is pure deception on Arndt's part. The ransom note  was found that morning, which would mean that the call was supposed to come the next day! By this date in 1999, any ambiguity about this matter had been clarified, yet Arndt and Time Tunnel are clearly out to destroy the Ramsey's with this highly deceptive nonsense. So why is it that LE failed to 'connect the dots' on this matter? It's like Linda was working off of a script. Very spooky, I'd say. 

As I've said many times before, the Karr emails clearly show that there was a second author in the Karr camp, an author that was undereducated and made remarks that fit exactly to Jack Tarrance's condition at that time. The vast majority of the remarks that Karr made were exact and redundant copies, yet the second author made several screwy and specific 'off script' remarks,  complete with intentionally misspelled words, even when corrected by Tracey. This second author made remarks that had keywords and key phrase that were linked to the Zodiac killer case. Among several other things, he said: "electrocardiogram, Soon to become silent forever, Stop all the clocks" (Auden's funeral poem), as well as several other specific remarks. Tarrance died right about the time that the evidence of the second author dropped off. It was clear that the goal was to taunt the Ramsey's. It's also very clear to me that the main goal was to reinforce the false notion that JonBenet's death was accidental, when it was no such thing. This was the same basic deceptive message that Nancy Krebs was trying to convey. Karr's opening remark to the press was "things aren't what they seem". This statement mirrors the same exact threat of the Zodiac killer and is what I refer to as Zodiac Jack 101.

I've found 'Jack' (rabbit) clues in all of these cases: Zodiac killer, DB Cooper, OCCK and the Ramsey murder, as well as his JT initial clues. I've found his JT initial clues on several other cases from 1946 to 2001 on: The Suzanne Degnan case, Chicago lipstick killer, Black Dahlia case and the 2001 Anthrax attack documents, as well as some other cases that Nanette Barto has linked. Check out DB Cooper decoded on youtube, Nanette and I have fortified that person's findings with some very specific Zodiac Jack signatory elements. Everything I claim, is readily observable on the documents.

__________________
One small bit of info might make all the difference.
TerryB

Registered:
Posts: 925
Reply with quote  #120 
I haven't posted here in quite some time. I reviewed this thread to see when I first started it, which was March of 2012. Prior to that I posted several things on a similar thread that Nanette Barto had started here and subsequently removed after her falling out with Dennis.

I'm able to post images on Nanette's blog, whereas I can't get that to happen here. I've made many discoveries about the Ramsey and other cases since the last time that I posted here, these are some of those discoveries:
 
-The primary JT's renders this message (it may be in this thread too: "(It) exhausting daughter watching...Speaking daughter being...money killing family think killing."

-The word "Speaking" is part of this message: "The (Zodiac) not Speaking"

-"I We early, arrange" cascade of words has the word "We" is a structural anagram of the word Jew, this is one one of several Jew/joo clues.

-Two of the dollar signs are actually characters: One is of a 'fat cat standing up with it's arms crossed' by the joo/$100 clue. The other is of a floppy eared rabbit riding a tricycle.

-The crossed out words were covered up by some interesting things like the drawing of an old time boat-tailed speedster (hint...a speedy delivery)

-The misspelled word "Follaw" (sic) is an anagram of Flova, which was Jack Tarrance's mother's name. The 340 cipher has a Flova clue in all four quadrants. The Black Dahlia case has Tarrance's name hinted phonetically and also has a FoLLoW/Flova clue. The Flova clues are the best evidence to cinch things up that Jack Tarrance is the the culprit. Yes...both Kaufman's and Barto's handwriting workmanship are good, it's the main reason that I've stuck it out with this business.

-The aaughter/daughter/otter/signature on the "Concerned Citizen" typewritten Zodiac note were one of Jack's key devices that he used to tie these cases(anthrax included) all together.

-I've currently been writing that I believe that the "poorly chewed" pineapple found in JonBenet', was pumped into her postmortem.

-I agree with my friends at abeldanger.net that the murder could very well have included Russell Williams as one of the people that actually carried out the murder. I also enjoy their investigatory efforts too.

-Oh, and yes... Jack most certainly had inside information in the DB Cooper hijacking, at a minimum.

__________________
One small bit of info might make all the difference.
Previous Topic | Next Topic
Print
Reply


Create your own forum with Website Toolbox!