Message Board
Register  |   |   |  Calendar
 
 
 


Reply
  Author   Comment   Page 38 of 38     «   Prev   35   36   37   38
TerryB

Registered:
Posts: 920
Reply with quote  #556 
Except that Dennis has said he believes that Jack penned the JBR ransom letter, I've never made the claim that Jack did the killing himself, I've only said that otherwise the crime was Zodiac Jack 101.

One witness claims to have seen Mark Karr at the Boulder Greyhound bus station at 12:15am Dec 26th 1996 wearing a bright red patch over his heart.

__________________
One small bit of info might make all the difference.
jbradfield66

Registered:
Posts: 112
Reply with quote  #557 
Actually terry, you have suggested in the past that Jack perhaps flew a plane dressed as Santa Claus to boulder to move about undetected. Seriously, you said that. It's up there with catseye's burning semen syndrome theory, but you stated that. As well, you have postulated that jack tried to arrange JBR's body into the initials JT. Certainly sounds like you were claiming that jack did the killing himself and was present at the scene.

As for zodiac jack 101 crime let's see:

California - Colorado
Ransom letter -- letter to police
very young girl -- teens, young man
Broke into a house -- outside in secluded areas and a taxi cab
Inside knowledge of the victims -- randomly selected

The list of differences goes on and on. It's hardly zodiac jack 101.
TerryB

Registered:
Posts: 920
Reply with quote  #558 
Using the terms "suggested" and "postulated" are fair. As I recall, I probably used terms like; "I can't help but feel" or "I wonder if".

jbradfield66; you repeatedly miss-characterized and miss-state things and then you wanna discuss things about these cases. Comparing my writings to cateyes burning semem or any of her other nonsense is more of the same from you. She serves to derail the Zodiac=Jack case and so do you.

I did say that I feel or suspect that Jack arranged E. Short's/Black Dahlia's body sections to form the letters JT. I wondered if he did the same in the JBR case and wanted to mimic the skeleton card pose and the pose he struck in the 1974 photo of himself.

__________________
One small bit of info might make all the difference.
jbradfield66

Registered:
Posts: 112
Reply with quote  #559 
That's cute. He still can't address specific points. Terry can only make accusations. Sorry pal, floating the idea that jack flew a private plane to Boulder on Christmas eve dressed as Santa claus so he could move around undetected is as batshit nuts as burning semen. The fact you don't think so speaks volumes about you. Now do you want to address the legitimate points I raised or are you going to play your little games some more? I suspect I know the answer but go on surprise me! You can do it big guy!
jbradfield66

Registered:
Posts: 112
Reply with quote  #560 
And surprise no response from a terry to a direct question. Dude's a joke. Hope he and nanette are enjoying their little echo-chamber circle jerk. Fortunately no on else cares about them beyond their entertainment value.
TerryB

Registered:
Posts: 920
Reply with quote  #561 
Once again jbradfield666 demonstrates what a really low-life turd he really is.
__________________
One small bit of info might make all the difference.
jbradfield66

Registered:
Posts: 112
Reply with quote  #562 
Keep it coming terry. It's pure comedy. Watching you squirm and avoid questions is entertaining.
TerryB

Registered:
Posts: 920
Reply with quote  #563 
I never avoid valid questions, I won't dignify loaded questions with a direct response to a deceptive flamer such as jbradfield666.


__________________
One small bit of info might make all the difference.
jbradfield66

Registered:
Posts: 112
Reply with quote  #564 
Nope. Nice try you spineless twat. You literally don't respond to any question or inquiry. A loaded question is not one that challenges your weird little pedo assumptions.

Here's a valid question. Can you elaborate on your claim that Dennis was involved in murders and "knows more than he let on'? You made that claim and I am now sincerely asking for some clarity.

Any objective observer can can appreciate the validity of that question. There you go. Valid question. Answer it you spineless, neutered creep.
TerryB

Registered:
Posts: 920
Reply with quote  #565 
Once again nasty little jbradfield666 lies.

My statement verbatim was: "Perhaps Dennis knows more than he wants to say." That's not accusing him of anything, the keyword being "Perhaps".

"Perhaps" jbradfield66 is the actual killer of JonBenet Ramsey? He/she has definitely revealed themselves to a very nasty and viscous person.

__________________
One small bit of info might make all the difference.
jbradfield66

Registered:
Posts: 112
Reply with quote  #566 
And terryb didn't answer the question. Point proven.

My actual valid question was t clarify your 'perhaps'. Explain what you meant with that vague accusation. My VALID question was what do you mean by 'perhaps'? You can't leave yourself with vague outs like that. I'm calling you on it asshole. So answer the fucking VALID DIRECT question. You keep exposing yourself. And I'm sure it's not the first time you've exposed yourself, right terry? Do you really want people know about the charges that were 'perhaps' brought against you?

TerryB

Registered:
Posts: 920
Reply with quote  #567 
And again more vial verbal excrement from jbradfield666's face.
__________________
One small bit of info might make all the difference.
dennislkaufman

Avatar / Picture

Moderator
Registered:
Posts: 558
Reply with quote  #568 
jbradfield66 you are starting to remind me of Tom Voigt with with your little outbursts, it's just a fucking discussion so chill out and quit acting like a little baby.
TerryB

Registered:
Posts: 920
Reply with quote  #569 
I haven't posted here in awhile mainly because I don't care to deal with people like jbradefield666 and also because I want some of my last statements to stand.

Back to the handwriting: In recent times I've personally shown a group of 13-14 pages of key documents that I've annotated, to several smart people that I've met. My criteria is that these same people must be bright and open minded. One of these documents is Dennis Kaufman's 'Jack Tarrance/Zodiac killer' handwriting comparisons. IMHO it's one of the best documents involved and it is a key document. It's the primary reason why I've stuck with these cases. Couple that same document with all of the rest of Kaufman's evidence and any reasonably minded person will witness the validity of the whole subject.

__________________
One small bit of info might make all the difference.
Previous Topic | Next Topic
Print
Reply


Create your own forum with Website Toolbox!