Message Board
Sign up  |   |   |  Calendar
 
 
 


Reply
  Author   Comment   Page 35 of 38     «   Prev   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   Next
jbradfield66

Registered:
Posts: 112
Reply with quote  #511 
Sorry Terry, what part of that is a lie? I know you're in a bad mood because your little crush is being exposed as a fraud but don't take it out on me.
jbradfield66

Registered:
Posts: 112
Reply with quote  #512 
03/12/10 at 10:31 PM

Subject: Responses to Jacks Handwriting (Posted by SC 6/14/09!)
Posted By: dennislkaufman

Nanette, handwriting might not lie but you do. You have lost all credibility with almost everyone including me! You have become a nutjob in the first degree. Here are photo's I just took of my mother's diary, it confirms that Jack was at my house in Citrus Heights California on December 25, 1996. There is no way possible that Jack killed Jon Bennet Ramsy, period![I][/I] I will be contacting Steph Watts and Tim Miller and see if they will post on this message board about Nanette's accusations that I tried to sell them evidence, this is a f.cking joke. Nanette lied to Tim Miller and told him that she had evidence linking Jack to his daughters murder, so Tim came to California from Texas only to have Nanette's conspiracy theory shoved down his throat! Nanette's career is going to be short lived because of her own actions. I have never in my life seen someone so foolish.
-----------------------------------------------------------------


03/12/10 at 11:12 PM

Subject: Responses to Jacks Handwriting (Posted by SC 6/14/09!)
Posted By: dennislkaufman

Nanette you have been exposed and you know it! Tim Miller or Steph Watts never told you I asked for money, and you know it! This was fabricated by you, and only you! I tried to tell you Jack DID NOT kill Jon B Ramsy, but you wouldn't listen! I will tell you again, go back to doing what you did before you met me. I thought you were about the truth, then you try and convince people that I tried to sell evidence, and you know damn well I didn't do that! I had Kris Pickel call Tim Miller, and Steph Watts, herself so she could here it from the source that you were lying, and they confirmed that to her. All the shit I have to deal with and you have to go and fabricate some bullshit like this, how can you live with yourself, you make me sick Nanette Barto!
-----------------------------------------------------------------

03/12/10 at 11:29 PM

Subject: Responses to Jacks Handwriting (Posted by SC 6/14/09!)
Posted By: dennislkaufman

Catseye, I know this is what the naysayers love to see but there is nothing I can do about that. I cannot and will not be associated with someone that outright lies. The FBI and everyone else including myself tried to warn Nanette that she was out of control and she refused to listen. Her actions are inexcusable and very unprofessional, and I should have never let her get so involved in this case. Unfortunately her opinion at this point means almost nothing, I already have another document examiner that is going to be taking a fresh look at the writing.
================================================== ==============
TerryB

Registered:
Posts: 925
Reply with quote  #513 
jbradfield66, you're the one that's a fraud you dirty lying dog turd.

__________________
One small bit of info might make all the difference.
jbradfield66

Registered:
Posts: 112
Reply with quote  #514 
And once again Terry is unable to answer a direct question. What am I lying about?
TerryB

Registered:
Posts: 925
Reply with quote  #515 
jbradfield66, your whole routine since you arrived here has been deception, there's is no discussing anything with you because you are a dirty lying dog turd! You lie about everything and you are part of a conspiracy to cover.
__________________
One small bit of info might make all the difference.
jbradfield66

Registered:
Posts: 112
Reply with quote  #516 
Calm down. Not sure how I can be deceptive since I've not claimed anything, unlike yourself who has made wild accusations and incredible specualations. Quite frankly your theories have done as much to discredit this case as catseyes.

Now, can you point out what exactly I'm being deceptive about or will you continue your childish name-calling, baseless accusations and hissy fits?
TerryB

Registered:
Posts: 925
Reply with quote  #517 
jbradfield66 will damage Dennis Kaufman even further, don't trust him, he's a mole.
__________________
One small bit of info might make all the difference.
jbradfield66

Registered:
Posts: 112
Reply with quote  #518 
I think you're protesting too much and are more concerned with you being exposed. You are still in contact with Nanette and were her biggest defender. Are you complicit in her fraudelent activities?
TerryB

Registered:
Posts: 925
Reply with quote  #519 
Dennis and Nanette have been friends for quite awhile now,I have defended both of them. jbradfield66 is a mole, that's for sure.
__________________
One small bit of info might make all the difference.
jbradfield66

Registered:
Posts: 112
Reply with quote  #520 
haha, that's your answer for everything. Sorr though pal, you're not going to bully me around. I'm certainly not intimidated by you. You sure do seem a little insecure though. It also seems that these histrionics from you are a tactic intended to derail the conversation and distract attention from the matter at hand. A game you play all too frequently.
jbradfield66

Registered:
Posts: 112
Reply with quote  #521 
Terryb, I'm not going to play your little games. If you have something direct to address than please do so in a civil and mature manner. If not, kindly stop with wild paranoid accusations concerning me.
TerryB

Registered:
Posts: 925
Reply with quote  #522 
jbradfield66 is not to be trusted.
__________________
One small bit of info might make all the difference.
TerryB

Registered:
Posts: 925
Reply with quote  #523 
Dennis, if you want proof that jbradfield is not to be trusted check out the link that sixtieschick put up on the first Nanette Barto thread, there were older posting there by him (or her) that clearly demonstrate that.
__________________
One small bit of info might make all the difference.
jbradfield66

Registered:
Posts: 112
Reply with quote  #524 
Terry, do you still think it's a plausible scenario that jack flew a private plane to Boulder, Colorado while dressed as Santa Claus so he could 'move around unhindered?" Do you still stand by that as a scenario that should be explored?
jbradfield66

Registered:
Posts: 112
Reply with quote  #525 
In case you forgot terry, or want to accuse me of lying again.

http://denniskaufman.websitetoolbox.com/post?id=4939489&trail=150

Today at 12:04 PM #143

"Nanette, JT could have easily flown to Boulder and back undetected, when I say flown I mean piloted a plane himself. If he was dressed up as Santa he could have moved about unhindered. The Hi-tech boot print found near her body could mean that a cop was involved in the crime.
Previous Topic | Next Topic
Print
Reply


Create your own forum with Website Toolbox!