Message Board
Register  |   |   |  Calendar
 
 
 


Reply
  Author   Comment   Page 32 of 32     «   Prev   29   30   31   32
dennislkaufman

Avatar / Picture

Moderator
Registered:
Posts: 558
Reply with quote  #466 
TerryB I will answer your question, but first I have to mention the fact that you have not responded to my accusations about who you are,why?
TerryB

Registered:
Posts: 925
Reply with quote  #467 
Well Dennis, if it is you, I'm certainly not Nanette, she lives in California, I live in Minnesota. Just because someone posts that on her board doesn't mean it's true.

Go read what I just posted about you and her on her MB.


__________________
One small bit of info might make all the difference.
TerryB

Registered:
Posts: 925
Reply with quote  #468 
Many of this boards members have been asking you about details regarding Jack's DNA for quite some time now, what details can you provide, like how good is the DNA because as you probably know it's about the quality of the DNA that matters? Then there can be issues about a "chain of custody", in other words who provided the DNA evidence source and the assurance that it actually came from Jack Tarrance. As you probably know; a chain of custody is a key legal issue with regard to evidence.
__________________
One small bit of info might make all the difference.
dennislkaufman

Avatar / Picture

Moderator
Registered:
Posts: 558
Reply with quote  #469 
The FBI was finally able to get Jack's DNA from a tooth brush, and some of his inhalers. This DNA profile could not be used to compare to the DNA evidence from the murder of Cheri Bates because the procedure was done different, it would be like comparing apples and oranges. In order to compare Jack's DNA to the sample that was found underneath the fingernails of Cheri Bates, they would have to get a sample of Jack's DNA and do the same type of test. This is when the FBI went to Texas a couple of years ago and got a DNA sample from Jack's uncle. The DNA was compared and they do not match.
TerryB

Registered:
Posts: 925
Reply with quote  #470 
This is the second time I responded to Dennis Kaufman's supposedly 4/27/12 post:

You need to clarify that statement.

1)How complete was the Jack Tarrance DNA ?

2) LE would have to have frozen fingernail evidence from that 1966 crime and have a readable DNA profile, did that happen? I doubt they still have that evidence.

3) You said: "The DNA was compared and they do not match. Who's DNA was compared? Bates' to Jack's or Jacks to his uncle?

__________________
One small bit of info might make all the difference.
jbradfield66

Registered:
Posts: 112
Reply with quote  #471 
What does 'supposedly' mean? Are you implying Dennis didn't make the post? Not everything is some vast conspiracy. I do understand you need conspiracies and subterfuge to make your little theories work. It's the only manner to explain away all your gaping holes and specious evidence. Guess what terry? Sometimes the easiest answer is the most correct. Your little contortions of logic make me laugh. The good news is that no one outside of nanette takes you seriously. And she has proven that she will accept anyone as long as they prostrate themselves before her and genuflect at the altar of her 'genius' and with your lips planted squarely on her ample ass I'd say you qualify.
TerryB

Registered:
Posts: 925
Reply with quote  #472 
Once again this jbradfield666 character reveals what a decrepit pile of dung he really is.

The questions were for Dennis you knob.

__________________
One small bit of info might make all the difference.
jbradfield66

Registered:
Posts: 112
Reply with quote  #473 
Hey, I'm not the one who gets off on discussing the 'brutal murder' of jonebenet ramsey. Why don't you answer any questions? Is it because you can't? You're actully worse than catseye. She's just a famewhore. You're a pervert. In summary, go fuck yourself asshole.
TerryB

Registered:
Posts: 925
Reply with quote  #474 
The questions were for Dennis not for lowlife turd jbradfield666. jbradfield666 has a reading comprehension problem.
__________________
One small bit of info might make all the difference.
TerryB

Registered:
Posts: 925
Reply with quote  #475 
The questions were for Dennis not for lowlife turd jbradfield666. jbradfield666 has a reading comprehension problem.
__________________
One small bit of info might make all the difference.
jbradfield66

Registered:
Posts: 112
Reply with quote  #476 
I asked you a question. It's a messageboard and I;m engaging in discussion. Unfortuantely you choose to avoid questions. So, to reiterate fuck you terry. Answer the questions or shut the fuck up. Got it you spineless little pussy?
TerryB

Registered:
Posts: 925
Reply with quote  #477 
This is probably a phoney message board because I doubt that Dennis is dumb enough to think that I'm Nanette.

Nanette pissed me off at times too but that doesn't mean I'm gonna get all polarized on her. She did a good job on the handwriting reports and she worked at tending the task of moderator for quite some time.

Once again this jbradfield666 low-life turd reveals what a mental midget and cry baby dick head he really is.


__________________
One small bit of info might make all the difference.
jbradfield66

Registered:
Posts: 112
Reply with quote  #478 
Yes, this is a fake messageboard and Dennis is an impostor and it's all part of the conspiracy set up by me and my clients.

Do you even hear yourself or is nanette sharing her meth with you now?
TerryB

Registered:
Posts: 925
Reply with quote  #479 
What's the matter jbradfield666/voigt/ashlee, the grapes just a little to sour for your sorry ass?

The Zodiac killer picture post cards aught to clue you dummies in: 1)A Jack rabbit in the snow 2) a Jack-o-lantern belly on the skeleton card 3) a one-eyed Jack on 4) a Jackass.

Matching letter styles and handwriting from the Chicago lipstick murders, through Zodiac all the way to the JonBenet Ramsey ransom letter and Anthrax that have several "Jack" clues as well as several JT initials, add to that many cryptic cipher figures with dots in the figures in all of these cases!

The JonBenet Ramsey ransom letter is saturated with "Jack" clues in the form of his initials, it also has the cryptic cipher sign off: S.B.T.C, many more clues point right to Zodiac Jack as a key player in these conspiracies.

__________________
One small bit of info might make all the difference.
TerryB

Registered:
Posts: 925
Reply with quote  #480 
Hey Dennis, it's come to my attention that catseye/Sucher removed both of her web sites, what can you say about that?
__________________
One small bit of info might make all the difference.
Previous Topic | Next Topic
Print
Reply


Create your own forum with Website Toolbox!