Message Board
Register  |   |   |  Calendar
 
 
 


Reply
  Author   Comment   Page 6 of 11     «   Prev   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   Next   »
TerryB

Registered:
Posts: 925
Reply with quote  #76 
All of the evidence that I've seen Nanette present is conducive to and supportive of Dennis' case. The Miller case is the only anomaly in all of her work, I don't believe there is solid evidence that she was at all deceptive regarding her dealing with the other parties involved, she did relay a second hand remark allegedly made by others that was negative about Dennis, if Dennis only recently read that remark I can understand why he now thinks she might have an alternate agenda but I plead with him to go back and re-read that in light of what I just said about it being a second hand remark.

I've tried to lay low for a week or so until the two of them cool off, I didn't and don't wanna take sides. Again the vast majority of Nanette's work has been helpful to Dennis' case. Nobody's perfect.

__________________
One small bit of info might make all the difference.
jbradfield66

Registered:
Posts: 112
Reply with quote  #77 
If she forged letters and manipulated the father of a murder victim she is most certainly not being helpful to the case.
sixtieschick

Registered:
Posts: 246
Reply with quote  #78 
TerryB you keep saying you are not going to bother replying to jbradfield66's posts and then you do. Just ignore and carry on. I agree with you on the Dennis and Nanette subject. I have been hoping this thing going on between Dennis and Nanette will blow over and they will make up. I don't know what to think. I want to believe that Dennis has bad information and Nanette did not do these things. It would be a shame to have to abandon the handwriting reports and break all ties with Nanette if there is a possibility that Dennis reaches his conclusions based on faulty information. That's what I keep hoping will happen. Dennis will find more information that shows his earlier beliefs were incorrect. I am not sure I would rely on some twitters accounts as proof. Jbradfield66 had someone use his name on twitter. Maybe some of Voigt's people created twitter accounts to discredit Nanette too.
jbradfield66

Registered:
Posts: 112
Reply with quote  #79 
sixtieschick, why do you think terryb should be able to make wild accusations and not be accountable for clarifying or following up?

Speaking of accusations that terry is so fond of. Here's a fun game. I'll make one of my own. Have you ever noticed how terry seems more concerned with Jonbenet Ramsey than the zodiac case? In particular he seems especially focused on pedophile rings? Well, I've heard that oftentimes people will 'fish' on messageboards with references to pedophile rings assuming the role of a concerned justice-seeker. They will try to steer every conversation towards not just the pedophilia aspect but specifically to pedophile rings. This is done in an effort to attract like-minded people, almost sending out signals or codes to one another.

Terry, do the boys at your street rods board know about your obsession with pedophile rings? Have you broached the subject there at all?

See, accusing is fun. Right terry?
sixtieschick

Registered:
Posts: 246
Reply with quote  #80 
Quote:
Originally Posted by jbradfield66
If she forged letters and manipulated the father of a murder victim she is most certainly not being helpful to the case.


Yes IF. Did she forge the letter and manipulate Tim Miller? Honestly, I can't tell. Dennis says he thinks she did because he was never able to identify the person Nanette says gave her the letter. Maybe this person was a troll and set her up. People have tried that before here.

Jbradfield66, TerryB is not the first person to look for Flova's and JT's in the various letters. A number posters have been doing that for a few years well before TerryB joined the board. Dennis has stated he thinks Jack wrote the JBR ransom note so looking for Flova's and JT's in it is not a novel concept.

As for conspiracies, well Dennis himself has gone on record here and elsewhere saying he has believed for years there has been an ongoing conspiracy by LE and others to conceal the truth about Jack.
jbradfield66

Registered:
Posts: 112
Reply with quote  #81 
That's why I said if. Right at the start of the sentence.

Sure, one cospiracy maybe. But when that's the default explanation for everything it's a little suspect. Do you believe, for example, that my username is intended to refer to Jonebnet Ramsey and I am here on behalf of my clients, whoever they may be? Seriously, am I supposed to take anything seriously from someone who proposes that as a plausible scenario?
TerryB

Registered:
Posts: 925
Reply with quote  #82 
The post I made about JBR and jbrafield66 having the same three first letters was just me giving he(r) some crap. It's not 1/10th as malicious as his/her repeatedly posing loaded questions and false scenarios. She/he can dish the false crap out but can't take it.
__________________
One small bit of info might make all the difference.
jbradfield66

Registered:
Posts: 112
Reply with quote  #83 
More asinine, baseless accusations from terryb. Predictable behaviour from the sniveling whiny bitch. I've asked multiple direct questions in response to your accusations that not once have you addressed. Why is that terry? Why so evasive and spineless? Just because you can't answer them doesn't mean they are loaded. And name one false scenario? Go ahead, do it. You won't because you can't.

At least catseye has the excuse of mental illness. You're just a moron.
TerryB

Registered:
Posts: 925
Reply with quote  #84 
jbradfield66 showing a real nice side of him/herself for everyone to see.


__________________
One small bit of info might make all the difference.
jbradfield66

Registered:
Posts: 112
Reply with quote  #85 
And terry yet once again avoiding answering direct questions. Sorry you're butthurt that I called you a name but if you could just grow a pair of balls and address direct questions, ease off your baseless accusations it could be more civil. Until you can man up and not be neutered little bitch go fuck yourself terry. Is that clear? Should I type slower?

Just so we're clear...answer the questions directly or shut the fuck up.
TerryB

Registered:
Posts: 925
Reply with quote  #86 
Hey,that's pretty funny! ROTFLMAO

Don't feel too bad, Little Bo-peep lost her sheep, Jbradfield66 only lost one goat!

__________________
One small bit of info might make all the difference.
jbradfield66

Registered:
Posts: 112
Reply with quote  #87 
So, there you have it proof terryb is simply playing games.
TerryB

Registered:
Posts: 925
Reply with quote  #88 
What we have for proof is the fact that jbradfield66 has no regard for the truth or justice, he/she has demonstrated that over and over.
__________________
One small bit of info might make all the difference.
TerryB

Registered:
Posts: 925
Reply with quote  #89 
jbradfield66's vicious and malicious remarks found especially in this thread clearly show him/her for what (s)he really is.
__________________
One small bit of info might make all the difference.
jbradfield66

Registered:
Posts: 112
Reply with quote  #90 
Care to elaborate Terry? Or answer a direct question? Or do you want to continue cluttering threads by playing games? It's very simple terry. You've made it very clear you are here to play games and talk about pedophile rings.
Previous Topic | Next Topic
Print
Reply


Create your own forum with Website Toolbox!