Message Board
Register  |   |   |  Calendar
 
 
 


Reply
  Author   Comment   Page 2 of 20      Prev   1   2   3   4   5   Next   »
dennislkaufman

Avatar / Picture

Moderator
Registered:
Posts: 558
Reply with quote  #16 
Mr. Voigt claims I am making things up in order to con people into buying my book.

Tom, my book is not for sale right now incase you haven't noticed.

Mr. Zodiac expert, it shouldn't be that difficult for you to realize I am not confusing the word "radian" with "radius" , I am reffering to the "radian equations" on that document, shows how well you investigate things.


dennislkaufman

Avatar / Picture

Moderator
Registered:
Posts: 558
Reply with quote  #17 
Below is more comments from Tom Voigt......


*Jack fit the physical description of Zodiac back in 1969? According to
Dennis he did, and here's the "proof:" http://thezodiackiller.digitalzones.com/1.jpg

(I don't recall any of the witnesses describing Zodiac as looking like he's
pregnant with triplets.)

dennislkaufman

Avatar / Picture

Moderator
Registered:
Posts: 558
Reply with quote  #18 
Tom, do you know what the word "paunch" means? The witnesses described Zodiac as having a "paunch", it suprises me you didn't know this. Jack might look like he is pregnant, but this is called a "paunch"
dennislkaufman

Avatar / Picture

Moderator
Registered:
Posts: 558
Reply with quote  #19 
Tom, do you just make things up as you go along? More b.s. from Tom below......


*Jack likely obtained wing walker boots during his stint in the service?
Yes, according to Dennis, and here's the "proof:"
http://thezodiackiller.digitalzones.com/31.jpg

(Jack was in the service in the early 1950s. According to the California
Department Of Justice, they didn't even make wing walkers back then.)

dennislkaufman

Avatar / Picture

Moderator
Registered:
Posts: 558
Reply with quote  #20 
They made "wing walker shoes" prior to WW11, get your facts straight Mr. Expert.........
dennislkaufman

Avatar / Picture

Moderator
Registered:
Posts: 558
Reply with quote  #21 
Below is another statement from Tom Voigt that is complete nonsense......

6) A Sonoma County composite sketch of the Zodiac? Now Dennis has gone from just plain confused to being a LIAR. Zodiac never committed a specific crime in Sonoma County. I'm wrong? What's the case number? Who was the victim? And why isn't that info on the alleged Sonoma composite? Where's the contact info for the investigating jurisdiction? Well? The FACT is, the "Sonoma composite" was simply an artist's rendering of what Zodiac might look like without glasses. It was NOT based on a witness account of a Zodiac crime. PERIOD. And don't you dare insult my intelligence by offering yellow book's ramblings as some kind of a counter argument.
_________________
Zodiackiller.com
dennislkaufman

Avatar / Picture

Moderator
Registered:
Posts: 558
Reply with quote  #22 
Tom, I worked with Sgt Steve Brown from the Sonoma County Sheriff's Dept for several months, and I can assure you that thier composite is not just an artists rendition of what Zodiac looked like without his glasses, who are you trying to fool partner. This composite was done in 1975, when a woman was stopped at a red light. A man came out of the bushes and tried to open the passenger door, the woman hit the gas pedal and the man fell to the pavement. This incident took place during daylight hours and the mans face was clearly visible, this is how this composite came about...
Snowbirdpj

Registered:
Posts: 17
Reply with quote  #23 
What is with this guy Voigt? What is his problem? If I were you, Dennis, I wouldn't even bother responding to this clown.
dennislkaufman

Avatar / Picture

Moderator
Registered:
Posts: 558
Reply with quote  #24 
Your right, this guy is a complete waste of time. I suggest that anyone who is being harrassed by this guy through private email should report it to law enforcement. This guy has a prior conviction for "staulking people"
DiamondD

Avatar / Picture

Moderator
Registered:
Posts: 716
Reply with quote  #25 
Dennis I think it's perfect that you respond to points that Tom tries to make that will discredit your case against Jack, my reason for saying that is because when you respond like you did above with fact based answers it totally adds to your credibility and the integrity of your case, plus I for one did not know that the lady saw Zodiac in daylight I thought it was in the evening when it was dark outside. Dennis remember your the expert on Jack, you are the one with all the facts.


Registered:
Posts: N/A
Reply with quote  #26 
Dennis, I think you should stop wasting your time on this thread. Tom has his own board in which to voice his opionions. He doesn't need to take over this board as well.

"Stand for what is right, even if it means you stand alone."
DiamondD

Avatar / Picture

Moderator
Registered:
Posts: 716
Reply with quote  #27 
I was kicked off Tom's site again. I posted a theory that I could not provide proof for, but I thought that's why they are called theories. He totally disagreed with my theory and told me I have nothing to offer his message board and deleted me.
dennislkaufman

Avatar / Picture

Moderator
Registered:
Posts: 558
Reply with quote  #28 
Diamond D,

Tom Voigt, is never going to change. I am suprised that you would have anything to with him after what he did to you the first time you posted on his message board. I know you are just trying to find the truth like many others, however Tom Voigt is doing everything he can to keep the truth covered up. Tom knows that Jack is the Zodiac, and he also knows that he is finished when the truth becomes known to people accross the globe.
DiamondD

Avatar / Picture

Moderator
Registered:
Posts: 716
Reply with quote  #29 
I have personally invited Tom Voigt to join this board. If he decides to take me up on my invitation I hope that Dennis will honor this invitation and allow him to join. The only thing I ask is that we keep everything to mature intelligent debates.


Registered:
Posts: N/A
Reply with quote  #30 
Diamond D, I find myself wondering why you've invited Tom Voigt to post on this board. Does he not have an entire message board of his own on which to discuss the case (a board from which, as you recall, he has banned you, me, Dennis, and anyone else who has put forward a theory of which he disapproves)? Based on emails Dennis and I have received from Mr. Voigt, I doubt that he will be able to participate in a "mature, intelligent debate" without resorting to his usual name-calling and ridiculing. Tom Voigt wears blinders, as has been pointed out by several people on his board. He is unable/unwilling to consider anything outside of his quite-limited line of tunnel vision. Just curious... did you check with Dennis before personally inviting Voigt to join the board?
Previous Topic | Next Topic
Print
Reply


Create your own forum with Website Toolbox!